NHL Coaching Carousel 2008

August 19th, 2008 by Trigger

Since there have been so many teams firing and hiring coaches this off season, I’ve decided to break down and rate each team for the selections they have made.  It was a fairly positive year for coaching replacements as teams seem to understand that recycling does not equal success.  Here we go:

 

Atlanta Thrashers

Old Coach: Bob Hartley/Don Wadell

New Coach: John Anderson

Following the success plan of the Flyers, Caps and Penguins by promoting from within, this is the perfect situation for Anderson.  He has spent 11 years coaching the Chicago Wolves, Atlanta’s AHL affiliate since 2001, and won the Calder Cup this past year to go with the one in 2002 and he knows every player that has come through the Wolves to get to the Thrashers since 2001.  Watch for the Thrashers to have the kind of season that the Flyers and Caps had in 2007-08. Grade: A+

 

Florida Panthers

Old Coach: Jacques Martin

New Coach: Peter Deboer

The Panthers get points for sticking with the youth movement and not recycling another old coach (see Tampa Bay) but there are a lot of question marks attached.  Deboer has been coaching in the OHL for the past seven years, those are kids in their teens that can still be molded.  Making the jump from junior hockey into the NHL could be a tough transition, especially inheriting a team that has underachieved for so long.  In the long run this move may work but my belief is that Florida will take a step or two backwards this year before heading in the right direction. Grade: B-

 

New York Islanders

Old Coach: Ted Nolan

New Coach: Scott Gordon

Once again, hiring a coach from the AHL is a great thing.  Even better, Scott Gordon is the reigning AHL coach of the year! How he was passed over by other teams is an absolute head scratcher.  The disadvantage for Gordon as compared to John Anderson in Atlanta, is that Gordon has been head coach of the Providence Bruins for five years, who are obviously the affiliate of Boston, not the Islanders.  Now, obviously 95% of coaches that join new teams are not familiar with the roster but in this salary cap era, every little advantage helps to cement a coaching job.  Due to the lack of talent on the team, I predict a similar finish to last season but a big improvement in 2009-10. Grade: A

 

Toronto Maple Leafs

Old Coach: Paul Maurice

New Coach: Ron Wilson

Now, correct me if I’m wrong but didn’t Ron Wilson coach the San Jose Sharks and never get to a Cup final? If he couldn’t get there with that talent, what exactly does the organization think he is going to do with the rag-tag roster they have now? Wilson has a reputation for being a tough coach and getting a lot out of his players which is good but the Leafs have (arguably) the least talented roster in the league on paper and the way GM Cliff Fletcher keeps talking about rebuilding and going younger, it is very difficult to figure out how the hiring of a veteran coach like Wilson makes any sense.  I believe that the personnel changes and the fresh voice in the dressing room will help but look for the Leafs at the bottom of the Eastern Conference for the next 2-3 years. Grade: D 

 

Los Angeles Kings

Old Coach: Marc Crawford

New Coach: Terry Murray

This situation is the exact one that Terry Murray is built for.  Take a struggling young team that hasn’t made the playoffs in a while and work with them.  He did it with the Caps in the early ‘90s, the Flyers in the mid-90’s and the Panthers in the late-90’s.  He has been a head coach a total of ten seasons and his teams have made the playoffs in nine of those seasons.  The disadvantage is that he is 57 and hasn’t been a head coach since 2001, which will take some getting used to as well as the fact that he is coming into one of the most struggling franchises in the league which still doesn’t have a cornerstone goaltender, the most important position on the ice.  The good news is that he has been working as an assistant to John Stevens in Philly so he has a blueprint.  The Kings will miss the playoffs again this season but will be better in the long run, as soon as they find their cornerstone goalie. Grade: B

 

Tampa Bay Lightning

Old Coach: John Tortorella

New Coach: Barry Melrose

There are a lot of things in sports that don’t make sense to me.  The Designated Hitter, cylinder interference, the instigator rule, but this one might take the cake: Barry Melrose, who hasn’t coached since the Kings fired him in 1995, takes over a team that won the Stanley Cup in 2004. Huh? It’s not even like he’s been an assistant coach, a junior coach or even a scout.  He’s been an analyst for ESPN for 13 years! Not only is this the absolute worst case of coach recycling, he was hired by the new owner of the team, not the former GM Jay Feaster, who was fired after the Melrose announcement.  Steve Stamkos winning Rookie of the Year not withstanding, this team could and probably will finish even worse than last year. Grade: F

 

San Jose Sharks

Old Coach: Ron Wilson

New Coach: Todd McLellan

Doug Wilson did his homework on this one.  When you think about the perfect path to becoming a successful head coach it would ideally go from AHL head coach to NHL Assistant Coach to NHL Head Coach.  Well, that is exactly the path McLellan has walked.  Furthermore, he spent four years as head coach of the Houston Aeros, winning a Calder Cup in 2003 and then spending the past three years as an assistant coach under some guy named Mike Babcock in Detroit.  After helping to turn the Red Wings into a Cup winner, he can now bring his knowledge to a very talented Sharks team that haven’t been able to get over the hump.  One extra advantage is that the Sharks and Red Wings have seen each other a lot the past three years so he is probably somewhat familiar with the roster.  You heard it here first: look for the Sharks to come out of the West and battle Pittsburgh for the Cup. Grade: A

 

Colorado Avalanche

Old Coach: Joel Quenneville

New Coach: Tony Granato

This is another odd move.  Tony Granato was the head coach of the Avs from 2002-2004 and was then demoted to Assistant Coach and replaced with Joel Quenneville who after three seasons was not brought back and was replaced by…Tony Granato? Granato went 72-44-17 first time around, making the playoffs each year and getting over 100 points in each of his two full seasons as coach.  Quenneville went 131-92-23 in three seasons and made the playoffs twice but never got more than 95 points in a season.  Well, if Granato is the better coach on paper I have two questions: 1) Why was he demoted in the first place? 2) Why did they wait three less successful seasons to make the change? I don’t know how much of a difference Granato will make but I like the Avs to compete although if Sakic retires, don’t expect any post season games in Denver this season. Grade: C

 

Ottawa Senators

Old Coach: John Paddock/Bryan Murray

New Coach: Craig Hartsburg

I’m a little confused about this one.  GM Bryan Murray said he would bring in a coach that would turn things around but as an NHL head coach Hartsburg has a career record of 184-190-69 with Chicago and Anaheim and has spent the past five years with the Soo Greyhounds of the OHL without a championship.  His head coaching success comes entirely with Team Canada where as a head coach he won two gold medals with the junior team which is great but is hardly a recipe that easily translates to a veteran NHL club like the Sens.  I’m not saying he will do a bad job but I’m not sold on him.  Look for the Sens to finish in the middle of the pack and make the playoffs but don’t expect a run like 2007. Grade: C

 

So there you have it, my opinion on the coaching changes of 2008.  I am going to go out on a limb and say that if the following teams don’t go deep into the playoffs, there will be a coaching change for the 2009-10 season: Carolina, Calgary, Vancouver, NY Rangers and Nashville.  Let’s face it, I’m right quite a bit.

View From The Cheap Seats

August 15th, 2008 by Shawn Lavigne

Beginning this week I have decided to break down some of the hot button topics that you the fans seemed interested in talking about on NHL Home Ice XM 204. I have never considered myself a hockey expert but a passionate fan just like you. You may agree or disagree with my views but that is the beauty of what we do on NHL Home Ice day after day so without further ado welcome to edition number one

Cheers:

It was a great week for the AHL coaching fraternity as Scott Gordon became the latest coach to make the jump into the NHL with the New York Islanders. I like this move by Isles GM Garth Snow because the Islanders want to go younger and Gordon has watched a lot of these guys coaching in Providence. It also helps Gordon that the Islanders still have 3 good veteran leaders in Guerin, Weight, and Sillinger whose experience is invaluable.

One day John Stevens may be considered a pioneer of the ‘new era’ of NHL coaches who paid their dues in the AHL and have put the ‘old guard’ of Joel Quenville, Paul Maurice, Bob Hartley, and Marc Crawford on the outside looking in when the 08-09 season begins. I am very happy the Flyers signed him to a new 2-year extension especially under the circumstances when he was first hired by the Flyers replacing Ken Hitchcock. He took over a terrible team but thanks to some great moves by Paul Holmgren last off-season the Flyers rebounded and Stevens was a big part for their turnaround.

Well it looks like Bryan McCabe will find a new address in Florida after letting the Maple Leafs know he will waive his no-trade clause but it will cost Toronto some big bucks to do it. You see McCabe will collect a cool 2 million bucks that his agent Ian Pulver negotiated as a signing bonus with former Leafs GM John Ferguson Jr. Pulver is the hands down winner of the ‘NHL Agent of the Month’ for September!

Congratulations to Cammi Granato, Brett Hull, Mike Richter, and Brian Leetch who were elected to the U.S. Hockey Hall of Fame this past week. It was great to speak to Brian Leetch on Hockey This Morning about his great career and ironically Hull, Richter, and Leetch may have been part of the greatest U.S. team in history when they defeated Canada to win the 1996 World Cup. I know the ‘Miracle on Ice’ team was a tremendous story but that team in 96′ was the best collection of talent the U.S. has put together. I am very happy for Cammi Granato who was a pioneer really for women’s hockey being part of the gold medal winning American team at the 1998 Winter Olympics.

Boos:

I have a lot of respect for the guys who write for The Hockey News like Mike Brophy and Adam Proteau but looking at their predictions for the upcoming season I just about choked on my lunch when I read it. Montreal will finish first in the East ahead of Pittsburgh, Washington, Philly, and Ottawa? Ottawa? I’m a Senators fan and I wouldn’t rank them that high I think Boston and Buffalo are better then the Senators this season! They also pick the Red Wings to repeat meaning they do not believe in the ‘Stanley Cup Hangover’ theory.

Can somebody explain to me what the Vancouver Canucks and GM Mike Gillis are thinking? Reports are still circulating that they are shopping Kevin Bieksa around to clubs around the league. Yes he is coming off a disappointing season after his leg injury but in a league where puck moving offensive defensemen are at a premium why would you move a potential young star when he hasn’t even hit hi prime? I am salivating at the report they may move Bieksa to Ottawa for Antoine Vermette which actually makes a lot of sense. Vancouver needs offensive help up front and the Senators are desperate to fill the void left by Wade Redden. If I was Bryan Murray make the deal NOW!

Have I been in a coma for the past 15 years? Russia is invading countries and Alexander Radulov is sounding like Drago in Rocky IV this week telling Russian reporters he stands by his actions breaking his contract with the Predators to play in his homeland and he hopes his move will spur his countrymen to do the same. Two week ago I cut this guy some slack but after reading his comments suddenly I hope his actions starts a new “Cold War’ in hockey. International hockey has lost a bit of its edge since the fall of communism but this week the world seemed to turn back the clock politically and on the ice.

Owners Would Love Players to Opt out of CBA

August 12th, 2008 by Trigger

When the 2004-2005 NHL season was lost, there was one sticking point that the owners wouldn’t budge on and the players eventually caved to the demand: salary cap.  The issue was with the introduction of a salary cap, there would be a maximum salary for each player based on age, years of service and current contract.  This mainly meant a pay cut for most of the players coming into the 2005-2006 season.  Well, as we head into the fourth season of the salary cap era, the cap has jumped about $15-million and many teams are back to where they started in terms of spending so the players are getting more money and more incentives than year one of this CBA.  Teams are willing to dish out things like No-Trade clasuses, No-Movement clauses and GMs have even lowered themselves to guaranteeing other players will be retained to ensure their stars sign.  The players are sitting pretty, like they were before the lockout and the owners, well, they must be scratching their heads and wondering what happened.

There is a clause in the current CBA that allows the players to opt out of it after year four, which just happens to be the 2008-2009 season.  At this point there is no reason for the players to opt out because everything is going their way.  The owners on the other hand would probably love the players to opt out so they can renegotiate a few things.  Case in point: the Toronto Maple Leafs.  If anything, this mess of an organization has shown how bad things can get in a salary cap era when the owners have deep pockets and give the GM permission to lock players up at any cost.  Bryan McCabe, Tomas Kaberle, Darcy Tucker, Pavel Kubina and Mats Sundin all were given No-Trade/No-Movement clauses in their contracts so when the team fired GM John Ferguson and brought in Cliff Fletcher to rebuild, guess what happened? He couldn’t move or trade the highest paid players that were offering the least amount of production.  Just for the sheer possibility that a star player might see this and ask his GM for the same deal or threaten to walk should get the owners wanting to get that clause out of the CBA completely at any cost (even getting rid of the salary cap).  Now, obviously the Leafs are an obvious example of a badly run organization and are the extreme situation but if a team with such history and such clout can fall so far, would it not be easy for a Rick Nash to pull the same demands on a small market team like Columbus and send them into a tail spin if he gets injured or stops producing but refuses to let them trade him? The most amazing thing to me is that this isn’t publicly talked about more because it has to be a concern to some teams. 

I am fairly certain the players will not opt out and at the next round of negotiations for the new CBA, there will be a whole new set of issues to debate but I have to believe that this issue will still be around and the owners will have to decide what is more dangerous: a star player UFA with no salary cap or a star player UFA with a no-movement clause.

It Was Twenty Years Ago Tomorrow (08.09.88)

August 8th, 2008 by MickKern

So…with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, what are we to make of the Great Gretzky Selloff of ‘88?

More often-than-not, sports commentators will drag out of the old company line that the trade of Wayne Gretzky to the Los Angeles Kings helped grow the game of hockey in non-traditional markets.

Did it?  And if it did, to what extent?  And what has been the permanence of that impact?  And what have been the drawbacks of that impact, if any?

The actual trading of Gretzky, by suddenly cash-poor Peter Pocklington of the Edmonton Oilers, was an event that knocked all other news stories off the Canadian front pages and newscasts that August 9th evening.  Though the trade had been in the works for possibly months, most of Joe Q. Public only got a whiff of it a couple of days beforehand.

Mick Q. Public vividly recalls laughing it up at one of the fine pubs on Elgin Street in downtown Ottawa, drunk with the knowledge that no hockey man in his right mind would make such a trade.  The Oilers were a bona fide dynasty already; four Stanley Cups in five years…and they should have been able to win the 1986 Cup.  The future still looked very, very bright for this young, talented team from Northern Alberta.

But as most of us know, sometimes rather painfully, professional sports is first-and-foremost a business, and businesses like to make money, and there’s nothing wrong with that.  Granted, often businesses make a deal or two with Satan enroute to Enron status, or shamefully exploit the undervalued/undereducated worker in third-world countries, but hey, what’s a few twisted morals in exchange for cheap sneakers!?!

Enter one Peter Puck, would-be Canadian Prime Minister, hostage survivor, and all-around Gainers meat kind of guy, one not afraid to use strike-breakers during a labour strike.  In other words, a man not afraid to put himself first.

Damn a once-in-a-lifetime professional hockey team, damn an immortal legacy of near-perfection, damn it all!   What can I get for my depreciating asset aka Wayne Douglas Gretzky? 

When the trade of Gretzky was confirmed that evening, for many of us, it was the end of the National Hockey League as a sort of national trust.  Sure, most of the teams were stationed in the United States, but we’re Canadian, remember.  Most of our cities are nestled a shoeshoe’s throw away from the 49th parallel.  Our cultural and financial dialogue is more North-South than East-West.  Heck, we like the Americans.  After all, history and geography have made us practically brothers.

At its core, the NHL was as Canadian as maple syrup, the Guess Who, Maggie Trudeau at Studio 54, and those Hinterland Who’s Who mini-documentaries that always came on to fill up screen time right after the Saturday morning cartoons were over.  We could deal with the fact the league was largely run from the U.S.; we had become somewhat comfortable living with a branch-plant mentality.  To prove the point, we elected an English-speaking Prime Minister from Quebec who followed the same approach in politics.

But this, well, this was a bit too much.  Not enough to justify New Democratic Party MP Nelson Riis standing up in the House of Commons and demanding that the Conservative Government of Brian Mulroney block the trade (first-of-all, Mulroney was a free trader, so most likely he would have been more interested in seeing what he could have fetched for Mats Naslund), but we all got the good-humoured point…is there nothing Canadian left that is not for sale to the Yanks?

Immediate dividends were paid to both parties in the trade; the Kings suddenly gained national U.S. exposure and the Oilers added young talent to a still-formidable lineup.

The Wayner was suddenly everywhere; which goes to show that his wooden appearance on “The Young and The Restless” seven years earlier had largely been forgotten by Tinsel Town.  Wayne and Magic posed for the cover of Sports Illustrated, Wayne began to show up on the chat shows, Wayne and his lovely new bride were a semi-regular feature on that bellweather hard-hitting TV journalism show Entertainment Tonight, Wayne hosted Saturday Night Live, Wayne was on billboards everywhere, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne.

Actually, come to think of it, most of the U.S. were only then getting a taste of what we in the Frozen North had already endured for years; Wayne as National Spokesperson for every product known to mankind.

But hey, it worked.  Gretzky sold.  He had pizzazz.  Wayne Gretzky transcended the parochial world of pro hockey more than any player before or since.  The Rocket Richards, Gordie Howes, and Bobby Orrs of the world made their dent, but Gretzky was known to people who didn’t care a lick about ice hockey.

He was a Superstar.  The only true one the National Hockey League has ever known.

And what better place for a Superstar than the brightest stage-on-Earth.  Los Angeles, California.

The L.A. Kings had finished the 1987-88 season festooned in their purple-and-gold motif, led by the likes of Luc Robitaille (111 points) and Jimmy Carson (107 points).  The Kings gained 68 points in 80 games, and lost in the first round of the playoffs to the Calgary Flames, who were expected to make it to the Stanley Cup Final, after posting a league-leading 105 points.

They didn’t get there, thanks to a four-game sweep at the hands of their bitter rivals, the Edmonton Oilers, who were having an “off-year” by Oiler standards, finishing with only 99 points.  The defining moment of that series was the Game Two overtime goal, on Calgary ice, by Wayne Gretzky…a howitzer of a slapshot over the shoulder of Mike Vernon.  The Flames never recovered.  They would have to wait one more year before hoisting their first Stanley Cup.

As for the Oilers, they rode that upset all the way to the Final, where they took on a Boston Bruins team still dealing with the shock of having finally beated the Montreal Canadiens in the playoffs.  The Ray Bourque/Cam Neely/Reggie Lemelin Bruins were so shocked, they actually let the upstart New Jersey Devils extend them to seven games in the Eastern Conference Final.

Not that any of that would matter; the Oilers dispatched of the Bruins in four games…wait…five games, as there was that infamous “power failure in Boston game” of May 24th that was declared a 3-3 tie, and the Oilers returned home (again) to Edmonton for the coronation.

That was the Cup win where Captain Gretzky gestured for his teammates and coaches to join him at centre ice for a joyful, informal team portrait with Lord Stanley, another Gretzky contribution to the rich fabric of hockey.  Did Wayne know something was up?  Did he want a momento to remember a passing of an era?  Come to think of it, the Gretzky-owned Hull Olympics of the Quebec Junior League were sporting black-and-silver uniforms that season, the very same colour scheme the L.A. Kings would adopt when Gretzky joined them.

After the trade, the Kings finished second in the Smythe Division with 91 points (the eventual Cup champions, the Flames, led the league with 117 points), while the Oilers were third with 84.  As fate would have it, the two teams met up in the first round of the playoffs.

Talk about an argument for not trading within your own division.  The series went seven, with the hometown Kings taking the deciding game 6-3.  While the Oilers went off and licked their wounds, the Kings’ magic carpet ride was short-lived, as the Flames swept them in four straight…which must have felt damn good for a number of Calgary veterans, who were usually on the losing end of battles against Gretzky.

From this point on, things get more interesting in the post-Gretzky trade NHL.  The 1989-90 Oilers teams, captained by Mark Messier, and with sizeable contributions from the young players obtained in the big trade, won the Cup that season, the fifth in seven years for Edmonton.  The Kings, led by coach Tom Webster, couldn’t get past the second round.  They didn’t need Wayne Gretzky for that.  The Kings had been bumping their heads on the second round glass ceiling for years.

The Oilers couldn’t defend their 1990 Cup, falling in five in the third round to the powerhouse Minnesota North Stars, who had all of 68 points in the regular-season, but not before first disposing of Gretzky and his Kings in the second round.

It took the installing of Barry Melrose as head coach, and some Tony Robbins tapes, for the Kings for finally get past their playoff barrier, and all the way to the 1993 Stanley Cup Final, where, thanks in part to the first boneheaded move in the career of Marty McSorley, they lost in five games to Patrick Roy/Kirk Muller/John LeClair and the Montreal Canadiens.

In some ways, the 1993 playoffs was Gretzky’s greatest post-season performance, including a memorable and (in Toronto) a somewhat controversial third-round seven-game series with the resurgent Toronto Maple Leafs.  Game Seven was held in Gretzky’s boyhood backyard, Maple Leaf Gardens, and the Great One responded, putting the Kings on his back and leading them where Marcel Dionne, Charlie Simmer, Juha Widing, Eddie Joyal, Bob Berry, Gary Sargent, Daryl Evans and Rogie Vachon could not take them…to the Stanley Cup Final.

As they say, hockey went from the back pages to the front pages in L.A.  All the Hollywood stars that flocked to the Fabulous Forum when Gretzky appeared in 1988 were suddenly joined by their actor friends, and they told two friends, and they told two friends.  The NHL rode the Gretzky wave to new heights unimagined in the U.S. (though, it should soberly be pointed out, still well below the interest levels of the NBA, Major League Baseball and the mighty NFL), and the league surfed that wave further with the 1994 Cup win by the Mark Messier-led New York Rangers.

Only to see any and all momentum halted by a labour dispute that would claim almost half of the 94-95 season, thus spoiling all the hard work of the past two years, the league shooting itself in the foot, as only the NHL is wont to do.

But before that dark day, the league saw arguably the first fruits of the planting of Gretzky in the southwest.  Thanks to a dispute within the ownership ranks of the Minnesota North Stars, the San Jose Sharks were born in time for the 1991-92 campaign.  In a sense, the California Golden Seals were going home, but that’s another story.

While not truly an expansion team, for the newborn Sharks and the North Stars split assets, the team in San Jose was the first new franchise since the league absorbed the four remaining World Hockey Association franchises following the 1978-79 seasons.  The Sharks were the first “original” new NHL team since the Golden Seals relocated to Cleveland for two dreadful years.  To be more exact, the San Jose Sharks were the first almost completely brand-new NHL franchise since the Washington Capitals and Kansas City Scouts entered the league in 1974.  (To be annoyingly precise, the Ottawa Senators and Tampa Bay Lightning were the first completely brand-new NHL franchises to enter the league since that 1974 expansion).

The addition of the Sharks helped pull the NHL into the new era of pro sports that all the other leagues were handsomely capitalizing on. 

Marketing.

The teal-clad merchandise of the San Jose Sharks was an immediate success in the stores.  Like a scene out of Pleasantville, the teal uniforms of the Sharks took the NHL from it’s black-and-white days, in terms of marketing, into glorious technicolour.

Other teams took notice, and before too long, there was a rush to redesign uniforms, and logos, and eventually, the rise of the third jersey, decades after Major League Baseball had already introduced the money-making possibilities of the Sunday jersey, and the Tuesday jersey, and the Friday night jersey, and the throwback jersey, and the Fourth of July jersey, and so on, and so on.

On the ice, the Sharks were a success, making the playoffs in only their third season, and doing well at the box office.   The 1992 expansion to Ottawa and Tampa was fraught with potential peril.  The NHL shocked many with placing a team in Canada, particularly when it became apparent the applicants based their proposal on a land-grab and a house-of-cards, while the absentee ownership in Florida wasn’t much better.

But wait, things got goofier very quickly.  Just when it appeared as though the league would settle down to a a manageable 24 team league, one snowy day in 1992, the NHL dropped a bombshell by announcing that Miami and Anaheim would be getting teams.

Suddenly, expansion fever was in the air.  Want a team?  Got a team!  We’ll worry about the finances later.  In some case, much, much later.

The Mighty Ducks of Anaheim were the most curious of the early 90’s expansion teams.  Named after a series of second-rate family movies about a spunky bunch of kids playing hockey, the Mighty Ducks were owned by the Evil Empire, the Disney Corporation, who could never be accused of passing up a marketing opportunity, no matter how lame-brained.

This was during the reign of Michael Eisner, who, if memory is correct, went so far as to petition the league to have his NHL team sport those same gawd-awful forest green uniforms the kids’ team in the movies wore.

Thankfully, the NHL marketing gurus thought otherwise, and developed a rather clever, yet too cute, duck/goalie mask hybrid logo.

Which sold.  Like the proverbial hotcakes.  And who doesn’t like hotcakes?

The Ducks played in Orange County, where residents make it very clear to the rest of the world that they ain’t from L.A.  There was a ton of money to be made in that market, even if the level of interest didn’t translate to anyone outside of the arena (and this dynamic didn’t change even with the Ducks Stanley Cup win in 2007).

And it wasn’t as if the level of hockey would become watered down by all this rampant expansion; the talent pool for top-notch hockey players was entering a golden age (which we’re still in).  Players could be harvested from Canada, the United States, Sweden, Finland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Germany, and now Russia and all her former satellite countries, thanks to the breakup of the Sovier Union. 

Keeping this in mind, and never saying no to easy money, the NHL continued to bloat.  Before long, there were franchises in unlikely places such as Columbus and Nashville, and teams restored in Atlanta and Minnesota.  The North Stars had relocated to the great state of Texas, while three of the four WHA franchises, probably doomed from the start, moved to Phoenix, Denver, and Raleigh.

Suddenly, there were 30 teams.  In strong markets and weak markets.  In traditional markets, and non-traditional markets.  In television markets, and in walk-up markets.  You throw a stone, you’d hit an NHL franchise, though there remained doubts as to if you’d hit any actual ticket buyers in some cities.

Throw into the equation the weak Canadian dollar of the mid 90’s (when compared to the American greenback), plus the pipedream of a national U.S. television contract, and suddenly the power in the NHL had almost completely headed south, a paradigm shift maybe most acutely symbolized by the 1996 World Cup of Hockey win by the United States.

Canadian teams were having problems attracting or retaining key free agents, while some clubs such as the Oilers, Flames, Senators, and even the Montreal Canadiens, were experiencing financial problems, and the vultures were beginning to circle.

The league stepped in as best it could with the Canadian Assistant Program, and Canadian television money continued to flow into the NHL coffers in ways that would and will never be matched by U.S. TV.  Regardless, Go South Young Man was the new mantra of the National Hockey League.

And now we get to today.  Post lockout.  October 2005 to right now.

The Canadian dollar has rebounded considerably in relationship to the U.S. dollar, thanks in large part to unstable U.S. markets affected by the bottom falling out of the mortgage industy, and petroleum speculators, and other financial factors too complicated for most of us to wrap our heads around.  All we have to know is that the two countries’ dollars are practically on par.

Which makes doing business in Canada suddenly palatable again.  Where that leads the NHL is anyone’s guess, but even new NHL Player Association head Paul Kelly has mused about the stability of the hockey market in Canada, and if the league were to expand to 32 teams, one would surely have to be placed north of the border.

Romantics go on-and-on about the repatriation of the Winnipeg Jets, but most likely that won’t happen, even though, for example, the Phoenix Coyotes continue to struggle at the gate, regardless of the official party line from the team or the league, and they’re only one of maybe eight teams in some financial difficulty…even with Wayne Gretzky as the head coach.

And what about that Gretzky fella?  Can all this be laid at his feet?

In a word, yes.  Not that Gretzky nor anyone else could have predicted the ramifications from the first domino falling.

In a few more sober words, that’s waaaaay too simplistic a reading of the fallout from the 1998 Gretzky trade to Los Angeles, but the threads are there.

A few bullet points:

- Biggest Star in League History is traded to Los Angeles

- L.A. media, thus much of the U.S. national media, suddenly awake to the fact they’ve had an NHL team for the past 21 years

- Gretzky is catapulted in to the same stratosphere as the likes of Michael Jordan and Larry Bird

- NHL benefits from the marketing of Gretzky

- hockey is suddenly “hot”

- speculators want to get in on the action, some with money (Disney), some without (McNall, Boots, etc…)

- NHL takes the easy expansion money, and suddenly grows from 21 teams to 30 teams in less than a decade

- former NBA executive Gary Bettman is hired as NHL Commissioner to oversee the new NHL, chiefly to land that ever-elusive big U.S. TV contract

- that contract never comes-to-pass, and the NHL is no longer the fourth sport in the U.S., as a split in the open-wheel racing community in the U.S. and Canada allows NASCAR to move up in popularity at an astonishing rate, becoming a marketing and television behemoth

- with no big U.S. television contract, and shrinking audience numbers on the likes of Fox and ESPN, the NHL finds itself on the newly renamed Versus network, immediately frustrating a large number of American hockey fans

- NHL and its players squander an entire season (R.I.P. 2004-2005) thanks to a labour dispute, which it’s still to fully recover from, though it is pointed in the right direction, thanks to the likes of Alexander Ovechkin and Sidney Crosby

- with no big U.S. TV contract, anywhere from six to eight U.S. based teams are in some financial difficulty, so much so that reportedly up to eight of them have contacted Blackberry guru Jim Balsillie to gauge his interest in taking over part or all of the team, even though the NHL appeared to do everything in its power to dissuade the Kitchener, Ontario-based billionaire from owning a franchise

Conclusion…thanks for nothing, Wayne. 

Is that the true legacy of the Gretzky trade to the Kings.  Crappy U.S.-based teams in markets that can’t sustain them?

It’s not like there’s not NHL fans in the United States; if anything, there’s more hockey fans in the U.S than in Canada, just going by sheer population numbers alone, so it’s only logical a league would base the vast majority of its franchises in the States.

But not in cities/areas where, after a decade, it’s still to take root.  Instead of Phoenix or Atlanta or Nashville, why not, say, Milwaukee.  They were once offered a crack at a team, but balked at the high expansion fee.

Go figure.   A potential owner who said I ain’t got that much money, instead of the charlatans who have pulled the wool over the eyes of the league and received their expansion team regardless.

The 1980 U.S. Olympic Team’s gold medal did more for hockey in the U.S than the Gretzky trade to L.A.  Both events are getting smaller and smaller in the rear-view mirror, and no doubt the grace of Mike Modano, or the grit of Jeremy Roenick or the Cups wins by the Detroit Red Wings have been a greater motivator for interest in hockey in the States.

If anything, the Gretzky trade to L.A. did more damage to the NHL than it did sustainable good.

But you won’t hear that from most quarters.  You’ll hear the same old line trotted out.  The trade of Gretzky to the Kings helped grow the game of hockey in the States.

- Mick Kern

(p.s. even the 99 of Gretzky is no longer sancrosanct in Los Angeles, as Manny Ramirez wears the number for the Los Angeles Dodgers.  There outta be a law)

Suggestions to Speed Up the Off Season Drag

July 29th, 2008 by Trigger

When compared to MLB, NBA and the NFL, the National Hockey League has the longest season of all but the off season feels even longer.  Everything is top loaded into June and early July leaving late July and all of August as long, long days.  Last year, the regular season started on September 29 2007 and the Red Wings hoisted the Cup on June 4 2008. That’s 8 months, 6 days and with next season starting on October 4 2008, exactly 4 months to the day of the Cup win, the summer would seem shorter if they would spread a few things out. 

Obviously, everythig is scheduled for a reason but if I  could run the league for a year, there are a few things I would make sure to change.

The Draft: We barely get to digest the Cup win and we have to turn our attention to the up and comers.  This year, the draft was in Ottawa on June 20 and 21, only 16 days removed from the Cup final.  I truly believe the draft should be moved to early August for a few reasons.  First, it would give scouts nad management more time to go over their prospect lists once the regular season is over.  I believe that some bad hockey decisions come when management has too much on its plate.  Second, the draft is a big deal and shouldn’t be overshadowed by the just concluded Cup finals.  August is a quiet month for the NHL and it would put a big spotlight on all the future stars.  Finally, with Free Agency on July 1st, teams could build their prospect list based on who they sign and don’t sign.  If a team drafts a top rated scoring forward because they figure they won’t be able to sign one, and then end up accidnetally out bidding someone, it could change the makeup of the team.  Why not let teams spend their money first and look to the future second?

NHL Awards: Usually scheduled no more than one week after the IF NECCESSARY Game 7 of the finals.  I think this is a good time for them but if we move the draft to August, we can push the awards to the end of June and again give a little more breathing room from the Cup finals.  The players that have just won the Cup can have a couple of weeks to let it sink in and bask in it before accepting their awards for the regular season.

Free Agency: I like the fact that July 1st is the official day that this starts every year and I think the beginning of July is the perfect time for it but I would make a small tweak.  Since the NBA starts their free agency the same day and Commissioner Bettman has a history with NBA Commissioner, I would ask the NBA to push their deadline to July 4.  If Canada Day marks hockey’s day why not use Independance Day for basketball? Failing that and keeping free agency in early July, I would rotate the day every year.  July 1 is always a different day of the week and if it falls between a Friday and Monday, fans are up at their cottages for the long weekend and not tuning in or reading about the signings.  Make it the first Wednesday of every July and every few years it will land on July 1.  The fans would appreciate it more I believe.

Arbitration: This is a small deal and if the draft moves to early August, you can pretty much leave this alone.  Let the eligible payers file and have the hearings bewtween late July and beginning of August with decisions rendered by the first Monday in August, about a week before the draft so teams can fine tune the draft board once the decisions are handed down.

Training camps: They can remain exactly where they are in early September, leading into pre-season games in late September and then the regular season.

By adjusting these events we have spread everything across the off season and given fans something to look forward to in June, July and August when a hockey fan starts bouncing off the walls for some puck action.  I know this will probably never happen but it makes sense to me so there is always a small glimmer of hope should the NHL ask me to run things for a season or two.

A Celebration of Life

July 28th, 2008 by Shawn Lavigne

18 years ago today on July 28, 1990 I should have died…literally

I was driving home from an overnight radio shift at CFRA in Ottawa and was one mile away from my home when I had a head-on collision with a truck. I fell asleep my car was destroyed and my body was mangled, I was given a 30 percent chance of survival and if I pulled through I faced paralysis. I was in surgery for over 8 hours as they repaired a torn aorta (which claims 70% of victims before they even make it to the hospital). Over the course of the next week doctors were worried about a blockage in my right leg which was badly broken and I faced possible amputation. My right foot was burnt and my left arm was shattered. Gradually the right leg came back to the point where I lost only the top of my right big toe. My broken bones where held together by plates and screws (I always called myself the $6.50 man) but I was alive.

Some doctors thought I would be in the hospital and rehab for a year. I walked out in 4 months on my own. They thought I would never walk properly and be riddled with arthritis by 30. I’m 39 and I have lived with some daily pain for 18 years but overall I can still walk 9 holes on any golf course and skate around a hockey rink. I really don’t talk about it until people comment on the scars on my legs or arm and ask “What happened to you?” When I share my story they think I am the luckiest guy on earth and they are right! I have been written up in medical journals and recently for the first time in 18 years I read some of the medical reports about how close I came to death.

In the end though when people feel sorry for me I always tell them it could have been worse. The greatest inspiration in my recovery was two things. My family and my friends! They never let me get down. There was no pity party only love and encouragement. It is amazing what a note, a card, or a visit does to pick someone’s spirits up. My mom never left my bedside until she knew I was out of danger. I have college professors who made daytrips to see how I was doing. I had friends designate shifts at night so I wasn’t alone. I have lost touch with some of them as we all took detours in life but I will never forget their kindness for the rest of my mine.

I was also moved by the determination and courage of men, women, boys, and girls who were in physically worst shape then I was yet you would never know it watching them rehab themselves. Some were without limbs some were paralyzed. How could I feel sorry for myself after seeing these brave people? They were my inspiration and they drove me in a way I never was before my accident or since. It makes you think about the ‘what if’ and as I rose from my bed this morning like I do every July 28th I think about what would I have missed if I wasn’t here.

I would have missed my new farm in the booming metropolis of Jasper, Ontario (ok you may need a Google search to find it!). My wife Lisa and I moved there last fall and we have our 2.5 horses which has been great. I found the unofficial mascot of the Ottawa Senators “Heatley” who is our mini. Something about smelling horse poop to clear the senses I guess? I thank my lucky stars everyday that my wife Lisa puts up with me. We are going on 13 years of marriage and sometimes it is difficult that we live 4 hours apart during the week when I do the show in Toronto. We have been doing it for 4 years and despite all of the obstacles we make it work. She deserves a medal for the insanity I put her through.

I would have missed the unbelievable support NHL Home Ice and Hockey This Morning gets every single day. I still pinch myself thinking how lucky I am working at an all-hockey channel and talking to so many wonderful people. I would have missed working with two great guys in Scott Laughlin and Aron Papernick who I have had the pleasure of working with for 3 years. Yes Scotty and Paperboy this isn’t a misprint! Not many people would like getting up at 2 or 3 am each morning but working with those guys on HTM have been a treat.

I would have missed working with some great people who I have come to respect greatly at the channel. Some are behind the scenes that are the glue of the channel who do not get praised enough. Sometimes they are my sounding board when I’ve had a tough week. In the end they always get me back on track.

I would have missed seeing my beloved Senators get smoked in the playoffs or standing in Ray Emery’s final media scrum in Ottawa. I would have missed Erik Cole’s celebrity golf tournament with the HTM boys and Jamie Shally-lama where as usual we embarrassed ourselves. I would have missed the Showdown of all ages in the parking lot or attending the NHL Alumni dinner seeing the greats from yesteryear. I would have missed one of my all-time favorite sporting events going to see the ‘Winter Classic’ in Buffalo. I would have missed the NHL Draft in Ottawa which was a great event to cover for the first time. I would have missed all of this if I didn’t live 18 years ago today. Instead I’m going to blast a little Joe Walsh ‘Life’s Been Good’ on my iPod and maybe put in “It’s a Wonderful Life” in the DVD player because today my friends my life is wonderful.

A Song for Mats Sundin - Please Come To Boston

July 24th, 2008 by MickKern

(With full apologies to Dave Loggins)

PLEASE COME TO BOSTON/VANCOUVER/MONTREAL/DETROIT

Dear Mats:

Please come to Boston for the springtime
You can stay here with some friends they got lots of room
They can sell your t-shirts on the sidewalk
By a cafe which you could be owning soon
Please come to Boston, but Mats said no,
Not sure what I want to do.

Please come to B.C. for the winter
We’ll move up into the mountains so we can’t be found
When the losses start to pile up during the season
And you lie awake wondering which Sedin is which
Please come to B.C., but Mats said no,
Not sure what I want to do.

Now this hockey world goes round and round
Maybe come 2012 it’s gonna stop
But of all the dreams I’ve lost and found
Don’t think I’ll ever win the Cup
I still need a dream to cling to
I wonder which team will do

Please stay in Toronto until the deadline
Once again we’ll try to trade your ingrateful ass
You can live in a house that looks out over the city
And there’s some stars that fell from the sky
Who now work at TSN
Please stay in Toronto, but Mats don’t know
Exactly what he wants to do.

CHORUS:
And the press said, hey ramblin’ boy, why don’t you settle down?
If Toronto ain’t your kinda town
You’ve already won a gold, so what’s left to prove
I’m the number one fan of the man from Bromma, Sweden.

Free Agent Signings of Yesteryear

July 22nd, 2008 by Trigger

With the 2008 Free Agent season almost over, I would like to take a look at some of the past signings that were  great,  indifferent and disastrous.  NHL GMs have been praised and hated for years after decisions they have made on July 1st. 

2007: Rangers sign Scott Gomez and Chris Drury to MAJOR money contracts and while Drury has a decent season, Gomez is a complete bust and unmoveable.  The Leafs sign 34-year old Jason Blake to a 4-year deal after scoring 40 goals with the Isles in 06-07. He reciprocated with 15 goals in 07-08

2006: Leafs sign Pavel Kubina and Hal Gil to long term deals.  Gil is now in Pittsburgh and the Leafs would trade Kubina for a bag of pucks to get his salary off the books.  Ed Jovanovski signs with Phoenix and as the team continues to fail becomes the most talked about trade bait in the league.  Brendan Shanahan leaves the Red Wings for the Rangers and has a great season but the team gets bounced early from the playoffs.  The Habs sign Sergei Samsonov which still gives GM Bob Gainey cold sweats in the middle of the night.  Eric Lindros gives it one more go in Dallas and ends up playing only a handful of games before he (surprise!) gets injured. 

2004: Dominik Hasek signs with Ottawa and has to wait an entire season before he gets hurt and misses half the season. 

2003: Paul Kariya and Teemu Selanne both sign with Colorado for a shot at the Cup.  It doesn’t happen but the headlines made for great fodder in Denver.  Dominik Hasek comes out of retirement to re-sign with the Red Wings and replace the scapegoat Curtis Joseph.  Sergei Federov leaves Detroit for Anaheim and his decline begins full tilt.  The Rangers sign Bobby Holik to a ridculous contract and after a career of not scoring many goals he (surprise!) doesn’t score many goals.

2002: Chicago signs Theo Fleury to a 2-year $8.5-million deal after four average seasons with the Rangers and after one year in and out of rehab and suspensions, never played in the NHL again.  Curtis Joseph bolts the Leafs to sign a 3-year deal in Detroit and after they get bumped by Anaheim in the first round they decide it was all his fault and he becomes a disliked man in the Motor City.

2001: Detroit signs Brett Hull and Luc Robitaille and a year later win the Cup with both of them contributing.  Philly signs Jeremy Roenick to a long term deal and Toronto does the same with Alexander Mogilny.  One of those deals worked out well, can you guess which one?

Other notables: in 1998 the Red Wings signed Uwe Krupp to a 4-year deal and after one injury riddled season was suspended for withholding medical records.  In 1997 the Flyers dished out a 5-year $16.5-million contract to Chris Gratton and a year and a half later he was back in Tampa Bay and starting his career as a pinball.  Although it wasn’t a July 1st signings, I have to mention the Islanders paying Alexei Yashin $87-million over 10 years in 2001 and then buying him out in 2007.

History shows that most July 1st signings don’t take teams over the hump.  Usually the best moves are re-signing their own players and passing on the ones that want too much money.  We’ll see how this year’s class pans out.

NHL HOME ICE XM 204 NOW ONLINE!!!

July 16th, 2008 by Shawn Lavigne

You have spoken and NHL Home Ice XM 204 has listened!

Effective immediately you can now listen to NHL Home Ice online! You will not miss a second of our programming.

XM Radio’s free 7-day online trial* now includes NHL Home Ice.

The puck drops every day on the world’s fastest sport. Listen to the action on NHL Home Ice - XM 204, the world’s first hockey channel. Delivering a high energy mix of information and entertainment, NHL Home Ice is the on-ice leader for fans across North America with analysis, excitement, up-to-the-second news…

Just go to XM Radio.com or XM Radio.ca (for Canadians) to sign up. Once you’ve registered and activated your account, go to the “Sports” tab on the player, and you’ll see NHL Home Ice (XM 204) available on the list below.

Some notes on the Nordiques-Canadiens rivalry

July 16th, 2008 by MickKern

During the first week of July, the guys from “NHL Live” had Alex Tanguay of the Montreal Canadiens on as one of their guests.  During the course of questioning, Tanguay mentioned that he grew up as a diehard fan of the Quebec Nordiques.

After the interview concluded, EJ Hradek and Don La Greca mused about the old Nords-Habs rivalry, and the differences between the two cities.

There are some great rivalries in the National Hockey League.  Any of the Original Six teams still have a smoldering hate for the other five squads from that era, though the rivalry fire may not burn as bright as it did during the heyday of the 50’s and 60’s.  Regardless of where the respective teams are in the standings, a Toronto-Montreal game, or a Detroit-Toronto, or a Boston-New York matchup is almost always intriguing.

Bitter rivalries are not limited to the pre-1967 teams; ask any Islanders’ fan.  The Rangers-Islanders dynamic has been explosive from the start, but particularily since the 1975 first-round playoff series between the two teams, where J.P. Parise scored 11 seconds into overtime in the third-and-deciding game of the mini playoff series the league used to hold.

Devils’ fans can speak volumes of their hatred of all things Rangers.  Almost any geographical rivalry is heated; Penguins-Flyers, and Maple Leafs-Senators come to mind.

My favourite “new” heated geographical NHL rivalry is, without a doubt, the Los Angeles Kings and the Anaheim Ducks.  The Kings have been in the league since 1967, while the Ducks are relative newcomers, but the good folk of Anaheim have one Stanley Cup to their name…one more than the good folk of Los Angeles, and don’t think this doesn’t get constantly mentioned by Ducks’ fans.

Los Angeles is one huge, sprawling metropolis, and even though it’s not located in traditional hockey country, there’s more than enough sports fans to draw from, which is why the league has two teams stationed there, even though hockey gets somewhat lost in the land of the Lakers, Dodgers, Angels, and even the Clippers.  What, still no NFL team in L.A.?  That’s another blog.

Regardless, the fans of the two teams are very passionate, and take particular joy out of dismantling the other team.   Say what you will about rivalries being established in the playoffs…I personally only buy that theory to a point…rivalries are forged by two factors.

One, frequency of face-to-face meetings.  The more two teams see of each other, the more there is a genuine dislike for each other.  A potential seven-game playoff series, with the stakes raised considerably, will no doubt foster such dislike.  The trouble is, unlike the Original Six days, or even the post-1967 Great Expansion, the odds of continually meeting the same team in the post-season is lessened.

Two, geographical proximity.

For example, the Calgary Flames-Edmonton Oilers family feud.  These two cousins have been chucking rocks at each other back before there were gravel roads in Wild Rose Country.

Highway 2 in Alberta separates more just the two largest cities in the province.  It also represents the gulf between differing day-to-day ideologies, if you will.  The city that Big Oil built vs. Government Town.  The swagger of the Stampede vs. The Gateway To The North.  Big C Conservative vs. Big L Liberal.  The Calgary Stampeders vs. the Edmonton Eskimos.  The Calgary Cannons vs. the Edmonton Trappers (well, not anymore).  Ralph Klein the mayor vs. Ralph Klein the premier.  The Bow River vs. the North Saskatchewan River.  And so on and so on.

Having spent my childhood living in both cities, I can attest to this on-going feud.  And this constant contest finds its way into the Flames-Oilers battles, regardless of the general effectivness of either team that particular season.

When the Flames made their 2004 Stanley Cup run, it appeared that a surprisingly high number of Edmonton fans suspended their distaste for their southern foes, and embraced the concept of “Canada’s Team”.  Yet when the Oilers made their 2006 Stanley Cup run, to me it seemed that Calgary fans were much more reticent to climb on to the Edmonton bandwagon.

Didn’t matter much either way, both teams lost in seven.

The Calgary-Edmonton rivalry is a heated one, and the dislike between the two teams has been very strong, particularily during the 1980’s, when the Oilers were one of the best teams in league history, and some very good Flames teams had to play second-fiddle.

Yet even that heated rivalry rarely got as nasty, and as low-handed, as the Quebec Nordiques-Montreal Canadiens war-on-ice.

There were a number of factors which made this the nastiest rivalry in NHL history.

First, as the two largest cities in the province of Quebec, there’s a natural rivalry; one the capital city of the province, the other the financial/cultural centre.

That in itself is no different than, say, Edmonton and Calgary, but here’s where it starts to get…intense.

Without devolving into a political examination of Quebecois nationalism and its place within the Confederation of Canada (and totally avoiding the sidebar discussion about Western separatism and the nebulous concept of the nation-state of Cascadia), the bitter rivalry between the Nordiques and Canadiens ran deeper than hockey.

Much of life, sports in particular, tends towards the simple explanation; the compressed version of complex issues.  It makes things easier to swallow, and most people don’t have the time, nor inclination. to look past the headlines.

And in that construct lays the Nords-Habs rivalry.  To reduce it to Separatist vs. Nationalist is not only simplistic, it’s downright inaccurate.  Quebec nationalism is also alive-and-well in Montreal (maybe not Mount Royal), as it is in Quebec city, and vice-versa concerning folk in Quebec City who have little regard for politics, and are rather content within the current framework.

Yet, the tall foreheads behind the Nordiques understood the emotional vein they were mining when they included the fleur-de-lye on the shoulder patch of the Nordiques’ uniforms, going back all the way to their original World Hockey Association days.

The Montreal Canadiens were the long-established, very successful professional hockey franchise in the province of Quebec.  To compete against that, a team in Quebec City would have to differentiate themselves in a flamboyant manner. 

The Nords understood the long-rivalry between the two cities, particularily in hockey.  One notable example being the Quebec Aces of the old Senior League, who were coached by Punch Imlach and featured a very young, and very talented, Jean Beliveau. 

Despite numerous overtures from the Canadiens, Beliveau chose to remain with the Aces, with the exception of two brief, yet tantalizing, appearances with the big club in the early 50’s.  Montreal were in the process of building perhaps the greatest dynasty in NHL history, and Canadiens’ GM Frank Selke was adamant that Beliveau would be a major part of that team.

The trouble was, Selke could only get Beliveau to sign a “B” form, instead of the dreaded “C” form, which would have chained Beliveau to the Habs forever.  The “B” form allowed a player some latitude, which Beliveau used, choosing to stay in the Quebec Senior League.

In order to get Beliveau in the uniform of the bleu-blanche-et-rouge, Selke pulled off a move that George Steinbrenner would be envious of.  He convinced the Canadiens’ owners to purchase the entire Quebec Senior League, and turn it professional, which gave Selke the right to invoke the clause in Beliveau’s contract that forced him to compete professionally only for the Montreal Canadiens.

Beliveau, of course, went on to a Hall-of-Fame career with Montreal, winning 10 Stanley Cups and the respect of hockey fans everywhere.

But the whole sordid affair has not been forgotten in Quebec.

Once again, the big bad city stole away the folk hero of the people.  Many in Quebec felt the same way when Canadien’s GM Sam Pollack engineered a number trades in order to make sure his club ended up with the number one pick in the 1971 NHL Amateur Entry Draft, thus picking up junior star Guy Lafleur from the junior Quebec Remparts.

Not the same situation as L’Affair Beliveau, but many were pulling for the upstart WHA Nordiques, who finally offered an alternative to the Canadiens.  The Nords’ owners attempted to woo Lafleur away from the NHL, particularily since the highly-touted forward put up disappointing numbers in his first three pro seasons (though really, totals of 29, 28, and 21 goals in those first three seasons were not bad, but not what people expected from Lafleur), and may have welcomed the escape from the Montreal media pressure-cooker.

None of this came-to-pass.  Lafleur ended up staying with Montreal, and of course, blossomed into The Flower.  After coming out-of-retirement in 1988 with the New York Rangers, Lafleur spent his last two NHL years with the by-then sad sack Quebec Nordiques.

As chance would have it, Lafleur’s second-last NHL game was at the Montreal Forum against the Canadiens, and the standing ovation for The Flower was the longest, loudest, and most emotional I have ever experienced (while acknowledging the ovation for The Rocket during the closing of the Forum no doubt topped this one, but I wasn’t in attendence that evening, like I was for the ovation for Lafleur).

While the elongated ovation was legitimate, it was almost as if the Montreal fans were making a statement to the Quebec fans that Lafleur was, and remains, ours.  We will fete him in the proper manner.  Anything you respond with will pale in comparison.

And it did.  Lafleur’s final NHL game was back at Le Colisee, and while the ovations and ceremonies were lavish, observers pointed out that the reception/farewell at The Forum was the one that cut through the flash and hype, and hit the heart.

On-ice, the Nords-Habs rivalry produced some very good hockey, particularily in the playoffs.  Quebec won in 1982 and 1985, Montreal won in 1984, 1987 and 1993.

The pattern was, if the series was decided in overtime, the Nordiques won.

1982, first-round.  Dale Hunter scores 22 seconds into overtime in the fifth-and-deciding game.

1985, second-round.  Peter Stastny scores 2:22 into overtime in the seventh-and-deciding game.

Both were considered upsets.  Both occurred at the Montreal Forum.

Montreal would get its revenge, but not without bloodshed and controversy.

1984, second-round.  Montreal survives the six-game series, including the infamous Good Friday Brawl, which led directly to defenceman Jean Hamel having to retire after a left-handed sucker punch from Louis Slegher.  This debacle is no doubt floating around out there on the internet.  It was a nasty affair, spilling over into two periods.  The third period couldn’t even begin, thanks to the festivities.  The Quebec Civil War reached an appropriate low when brothers Mark and Dale Hunter exchanged blows.

1987, second round.  Montreal outlasts Quebec in seven games.  The Nords chase Patrick Roy from the net, and backup Brian Hayward fills in admirably.  Someone still needs to explain to me why referee Kerry Fraser saw fit to waive off a key Nords’ goal late in the series, the one where defenceman Rick Green was tying up the Quebec forward who was besides the Montreal net, though it appeared to me that it was Green who interfered with Hayward.

1993, first round.  Most vivid image of this series?  Nords’ coach Pierre Page giving a verbal tongue lashing to Mats Sundin.  The Nords’ had this series in their hands, and let Montreal off-the-hook.  It was the first year back in the post-season for Quebec, since their loss to Montreal back in 1987, and for once, they had the home-ice advantage.  The Nordiques stormed back to take Game One in overtime, and then won Game Two.  Game Three went to overtime, which the Canadiens won on a Vincent Damphousse goal. 

This is notable not only as the turning point of the series, but it was also the Habs’ first of ten straight overtime goals that playoff year, a league record.  Montreal proceeded to take the series in six games, and marched on to the Stanley Cup.

That would be the last time these two teams hooked up in the post-season, as the Nordiques moved to Denver in time for the 1995-96 season…and won the Stanley Cup that same year…with Patrick Roy in net, thanks to a family feud within the ranks of the Canadiens.

You know events would not have unfolded in that manner if the team had remained in Quebec.  It would have been unthinkable for Montreal to have traded Roy to the Nordiques.

The Avalanche have been a success in Denver, wiping away the bad memories of the Colorado Rockies.  Yet I miss the Nordiques in Quebec, as much as I lament the loss of the Whalers in Hartford, and the Jets in Winnipeg.

Three former World Hockey Association teams, gone to new homes.  Two have won the Cup, the other one is inching closer.

Rivalries come-and-go. Some, like Colorado-Detroit, was smokin’ hot during the late 90’s, but has failed to retain much of its heat, thanks to ever-changing supporting cast.  The best rivalries persist throughout the years.

Even though its no longer fought on-ice, the Nordiques-Canadiens’ dynamic remains unique to North American pro sports.

(and a happy belated 400th birthday to the city of Quebec, which was founded on July 3rd, 1608)

- Mick Kern

Interesting Off-Season Decisions

July 16th, 2008 by Shawn Lavigne

As soon as the clock struck noon on July 1st we have seen numerous moves around the NHL. Some have been great and some have made us scratch our heads in wonderment and confusion. In the case of Mats Sundin, Marian Hossa, and Jaromir Jagr they stood on their own merits and did what was best for them whether it made and sense to us.

I have been reflecting a great deal and playing fantasy GM in my head which is always fun and keeps me from getting bored. So I’m sitting on my lawnmower Saturday for 2 hours doing the yard (yes it is a big yard) trying to make sense of it all. Here is what I came up with…NONE OF IT MAKES SENSE!

Brian Campbell and Wade Redden are good defensemen but do they warrant 8 and 6.5 million dollar contracts that the Blackhawks and Rangers gave them? Speaking the Blackhawks, they made a crucial mistake coming out of the lockout spending huge amounts of money on Martin Havlat (remember him?) and the Bulin Wall who have turnout out to be financial liabilities then Dale Tallon goes to a youth movement which revitalized the franchise last season. So what do they do? Go spend 8 million on Campbell and 5 million on another starting goaltender in Christobal Huet. Does this make sense you to you Blackhawk fan? Personally I think Khabibulin will be moved but the suitors are running out. No team should tie up 12 million dollars in cap money on goaltending. Their saving grace is Khabibulin is in his final year of his contract. I liked Brian Campbell but not for 8-years especially when the Hawks have a talented core of young defensemen led by Duncan Keith. Yes they needed a power play quarterback but not at that price.

I knew Wade Redden would get his money I was figuring $5 million especially after the past 2 seasons where his game in Ottawa dropped off. Well my jaw dropped when he received that same $6.5 million per season deal for SIX years. What kind of kool-aid is Glen Sather drinking in New York? Yes Redden is still the best first pass defensemen in the league but the rest of his game has dropped off. If he does struggle I also wonder how he will react to the pressures of playing in the Big Apple where it will be a rougher ride then in Canada’s capital.

Jaromir Jagr took rubles over the Rangers which was a possibility all season long. My question is if he is only going to make $5 million a year in Russia why wouldn’t Glen Sather bring him back to New York? Tell me who is better right now Jagr or Markus Naslund? I will take Jagr in a heartbeat. Yes he can be high matianence but he can also be one of the best players in the game which I cannot say about Naslund although I do believe his game is more suited for the Eastern Conference.

Marian Hossa chose the Stanley Cup champions over the Stanley Cup finalists for less money and only a one-year deal which shocked the hockey world. Pittsburgh fans think it was a slap in the face and he could have played with Crosby and Malkin for the next 7 or 8 years if he signed the deal the Penguins offered him. What does that say about Hossa? My thought is I have no idea! I understand he wants to win a Stanley Cup and obviously he feels he has a better shot in Detroit but what does that say about the Penguins? Does he think the Penguins have too many missing pieces even though they locked up Crosby, Malkin, and Fluery to long term deals? Did he not like Michel Therrien’s coaching style? For his sake I hope he made the best decision will he become Teemu Selanne or Paul Kariya. Remember they were the first guys to sign the one-year deals hoping to win a Cup. Selanne did but not with the Avalanche and Kariya’s game has fallen off the map with stops in Nashville and St. Louis.

Mats Sundin has a 2-year/$20 million deal on the table from the Vancouver Canucks. You and I would say he’s nuts for not taking it but we are talking about a man who has always done what is best for him. Look he may decide next week to take the deal but he’ll do it on his terms. After the emotional drain this past season thanks to Maple Leafs management where they were trying to pin their future on his shoulders he stood his ground and said he wanted to finish the season as Maple Leafs captain. There are reports that the Leafs did make an offer to bring him back. Why he would return to the Maple Leafs zoo is up to him but I think he is leaning towards retirement but in any event it will be HIS decision.

If I’m a Sabres fan I would be absolutely pissed off right now. Please tell me why they would trade Steve Bernier after he played a grand total of 17 games to Vancouver? I have a lot of respect for Darcy Reiger but this makes no sense at all. The Sabres acquired Bernier in the Brian Campbell trade with San Jose at the trade deadline. Bernier did struggle a little bit but still had 9 points on a bad Sabres team in those 17 games. He is young and could be an elite power forward. So Buffalo gives up on him for what? A second and 3rd round picks. It is time Sabres fans made this management team accountable because their recent moves the past two seasons tells me that they don’t care about winning and only the bottom line. I do like their pickup of Patrick Lalime to backup Ryan Miller but could Lalime be the starter if Miller wants too much money when he will be a coveted UFA next July? Time will only tell.

I could be writing all day about this next team but the team that has made the biggest splash this season is the Tampa Bay Lightning. It seems they have been the biggest newsmakers everyday for the past 3 weeks from Stamkos to Melrose to Malone to the recent trade of Dan Boyle. New owners Oren Koules and Len Barrie have been very aggressive to change the image and roster of the worst team in the league last season. I love the moves to get Ryan Malone and Olaf Kolzig but I’m scratching my head regarding the trade of Dan Boyle to San Jose. When they were announced as new owners both Koules and Barrie mentioned how important Boyle was to their future then two weeks later they trade him out of town. Dan Boyle is one of the best offensive defensemen in the league who can log an incredible amount of ice-time for you. Last season should have shown management how important he is to that club because without him the Lightning were awful. With him they were competitive so yes there offense up front has improved but I think their blue line has taken a significant step backwards. Matt Carle has not lived up to his potential yet and doesn’t strike fear into me like a Danny Boyle.

I could go on and on but my head is spinning but I need to ask one final question, who is Jeff Finger and why did the Leafs spend 3.5 million bucks on him?

A Great Ending & A Promising Look Ahead

June 25th, 2008 by Trigger

Is it me or is 2008 shaping up to be an incredible year for the NHL?

The playoffs were fantastic and ended with the two best teams in the finals and again, with the parity, its anyone’s guess who will step up next year as it seems Dynasties are a thing of the past. 

The usually predictable Draft was actually exciting with 13 trades in the first round including some major swaps of players like Alex Tanguay, Mike Cammalleri, Ollie Jokinen and RJ Umberger and a lot of picks changing hands which was an excellent lead in for July 1 Free Agency.  The list of UFAs this year is solid including Marion Hossa, Joe Sakic, Jaromir Jagr, Brendan Shanahan, Sean Avery, Gary Roberts, Brian Campbell and Brad Stuart so stay tuned for more major signings and trades.  

Another positive was the handful of great coaching changes giving a fresh group of guys a shot in the NHL including newly appointed Thrashers Head Coach John Anderson to go along with Craig Hartsburg in Ottawa and Peter Deboer in Florida thus avoiding another year of recycling.  With Brent Sutter in NJ, Michel Therrien in Pittsburgh, John Stevens in Philly and Bruce Boudreau in Washington, the future of NHL coaching never looked so good.

There is the talk of another Winter Classic either at Yankee Stadium or Wrigley Field which would be fantastic either way and should include two Original Six teams (perhaps the Rangers and Blackhawks) .  This past season’s outdoor game at Ralph Wilson Stadium in Buffalo was one of the highlights and the perfect way to kick off 2008.  As a huge baseball enthusiast, I would have no problem if the NHL ended up having the final event at Yankee Stadium before it is leveled.  It doesn’t take away from the legend, it adds to it as it will be the only baseball stadium to have the NHL play a game there before it closes.  It will also give the NY faithfull another chance to say goodbye to the old place. 

All that stuff was amazing but the most exciting and long overdue event of 2008 hasn’t even happened yet: a balanced schedule.  Now every city will see every other NH Lteam over a two year span with the teams that don’t come to town one year, coming in the next.  No more complaining about travel, no more crying about not seeing Syd the Kid or Ovie-1 in your hometown.  What more can you ask for? 

The answer is very little.  The prospects for the 2008-09 season are brighter than ever and this could be the year that the NHL takes a huge step ahead where marketing is concerned.  With the black steroid cloud hanging over baseball and the impending labour mess coming in the NFL, now is the time for Commissioner Bettman and Co. to leap ahead and finally get the league to the level of respect it deserves across North America.  Its taken some time and we lost an entire season but it seems that everything is finally on the right track.

EXCLUSIVE: NHL DRAFT AUDIO

June 22nd, 2008 by Shawn Lavigne

Here are some hilites from the 2008 NHL Draft in Ottawa. Hear from the Players, General Managers, Head Coaches about being selected, trades, and futures of their clubs.

New Atlanta Thrashers Head Coach with Mike Ross prior to the NHL Draft

Thrashers GM Don Waddell on the hiring of John Anderson as their new head coach

Lightning GM Jay Feaster went 1-on-1 with Mike Ross following the selection of Steven Stamkos

Steven Stamkos Media Scrum following his first overall selection by Tampa Bay

Drew Doughty Media Scrum following his second overall selection by the LA Kings

Zach Bogosian Media Scrum following his third overall selection by the Atlanta Thrashers

Mike Ross with the fourth overall selection Alex Pietrangelo of the St. Louis Blues

Luke Schenn Media Scrum following his fifth overall selection by the Toronto Maple Leafs

Columbus Blue Jackets GM Scott Howson on the R.J. Umberger trade and selecting Nikita Filatov 6th overall

Nikita Filatov Media Scrum after he was selected sixth overall by the Columbus Blue Jackets

Colin Wilson after he was selected seventh overall by the Nashville Predators

Mikkel Boedker Media Scrum following his eighth overall selection by the Phoenix Coyotes

Joshua Bailey talks to the media following his ninth overall selection by the New York Islanders

Cody Hodgson met the media following his tenth overall selection by the Vancouver Canucks

Canadiens GM Bob Gainey met the media talking about the Tanguay trade and trying to get Mats Sundin in Montreal

Panthers GM Jacques Martin on the trade of Olli Jokinen to Phoenix

Capitals GM George McPhee Friday night on the trade of Steve Eminger to the Flyers and Anton Gustafsson

Mike Ross spoke with a very proud father Bengt Gustafsson after his son Anton was chosen by the Capitals

SATURDAY

Flames GM Daryl Sutter on his NHL Draft weekend and if he was happy

Maple Leafs GM Cliff Fletcher talks about the Leafs weekend in Ottawa and the future of his club heading towards July 1st

Senators GM Bryan Murray on the buyout of Ray Emery and the Senators heading towards July 1st free agency

Mike Ross went 1-on-1 with Coyotes GM Don Maloney following the NHL Draft

Stars GM Brett Hull gave is unique spin on the NHL Draft with Mike Ross

2008 NHL Draft 1st Round

June 21st, 2008 by Peter Berce

1 1 T.B STEVEN STAMKOS C
1 2 L.A DREW DOUGHTY D
1 3 ATL ZACH BOGOSIAN D
1 4 STL ALEX PIETRANGELO D
1 5 TOR(from NYI) LUKE SCHENN D
1 6 CBJ NIKITA FILATOV LW
1 7 NSH(from TOR) COLIN WILSON C
1 8 PHX MIKKEL BOEDKER LW
1 9 NYI(from FLA) JOSHUA BAILEY C
1 10 VAN CODY HODGSON C
1 11 CHI KYLE BEACH C
1 12 BUF(from EDM) D
1 13 L.A(from BUF) COLTEN TEUBERT
1 14 CAR ZACH BOYCHUK Oct 4, 1989 Calgary, AB CA 5′ 10″ 175 WHL LETHBRIDGE C
1 15 OTT(from NSH) D
1 16 BOS JOE COLBORNE C
1 17 ANA(from CGY) JAKE GARDINER D
1 18 NSH(from OTT) CHET PICKARD G
1 19 PHI(from COL) LUCA SBISA D
1 20 NYR MICHAEL DEL ZOTTO D
1 21 WSH(from N.J) ANTON GUSTAFSSON C
1 22 EDM(from ANA) JORDAN EBERLE C
1 23 MIN(from WSH) TYLER CUMA D
1 24 N.J(from MIN) MATTIAS TEDENBY LW
1 25 CGY(from MTL) GREG NEMISZ C
1 26 BUF(from S.J) TYLER ENNIS C
1 27 WSH(from PHI) JOHN CARLSON D
1 28 PHX(from DAL) VIKTOR TIKHONOV W
1 29 ATL(from PIT) DAULTAN LEVEILLE C
1 30 DET THOMAS MCCOLLUM G

A Couple of Observations (as we head into Summer)

June 20th, 2008 by MickKern

As the clock ticks us towards the exact moment of Seasonal Bliss - the Summer Solstice (20:00 hrs edt) - time to put the 2007-08 National Hockey League season in the backroom with the snow shovel and the Christmas decorations.

First, some unfinished business to attend to from the Stanley Cup Playoffs.  For the second year-in-a-row, yours truly was triumphant in the “War Room Playoff Prognosticators Competition”. 

Last season, Rossy and I tied for first by correctly picking 12 of the 15 post-season series.  This year, I slumped, picking only 10 correct finishes, but Rossy came up one short, finishing second with 9 correct picks.  The rest of the crew checked in around the 8 correct mark, and Mr. Blakeley brought up-the-rear.

Yes, I can hear you.  Big deal.  But hey, I’ll take whatever championship I can get these days.

Second, the goaltender I personally believe is the Greatest Goalie Of All-Time (C), Martin Brodeur of the New Jersey Devils, ended up winning the Vezina Trophy last week, thus being crowned the top NHL goaltender for the 2007-08 regular season.

Okay. 

I don’t agree.

Brodeur’s numbers were solid, as usual, and he played behind one of the softer editions of the Devil’s defence, but I strongly believe Evgeni Nabokov posted a slightly superior season.

Their numbers are similar, but I give the nob to Nabokov because of what he enabled the Sharks to accomplish during the regular season.

And that distinction is important.  The awards are for the individual player, but the success of the player and the team are intrinsically intertwined.  Brodeur himself has benefitted from this equation.  For years, he played behind a stingy team defence.

Many tried to downplay Brodeur’s accomplishments because of that, but that was only a surface reading of the situation.

A goaltender is, in the long run, only as good as the team in front of him, and vise versa.  Sure, a hot netminder can take a mediocre team on a good run, particularily in the playoffs, but extrapolate that over an 82-game regular season schedule, and overwhelmingly, the true value of the goaltender-in-question (and team) is exposed.

Brodeur was, and is, a top-notch goaltender.  He’d succeed immersed in any team system.  Having said that, his best days are behind him.   That’s not to suggest he’s become a slug, just that his standards are high.  Very high.

And while the Vezina is awarded for a goaltender’s regular-season performance, it’s still revealing that for the past two playoffs, Brodeur has not been at his best.  Strange goals at bad times.  Maybe time to order Brodeur to rest more during the regular season.  Maybe time to develop a young goaltender in the Devil’s farm system.

But back to the Vezina debate.  The goaltender that I strongly feel lived up to the high standard set by Brodeur was Nabokov.  Apparently enough people agree.

Nabokov was named as the NHL First-Team All-Star goaltender…and Brodeur was selected for the Second-Team.

Huh?

The Vezina Trophy winner, supposedly the TOP goaltender in the game, is on the Second All-Star Team.

Not the First.

Now how does that work?

Yes, the Vezina and the post-season All-Star Teams are selected by different methods, but come on, it looks…stupid.

I can make the argument that it’s possible that the player who wins the Hart Trophy might not make the First All-Star Team.  Follow this.

Let’s say Bobby BigShot of the Las Vegas Coyotes has a monster regular-season, leading the Diamond Dogs into the playoffs.  But, Steve SureShot of the Hamilton-Kitchener-Waterloo-Winnipeg Predators leads the league in scoring.

Both are top-notch centres, the difference being that SureShot and the ReTred Preds were expected to have a monster season.  BigShot and and D-Dogs were media darlings, just sneaking into the playoffs during the final weekend.  SureShot is surrounded by great talent, while BigShot is thee man in Vegas.

Accordingly, SureShot is selected as the First Team All-Star, because he was the better centre.  But BigShot wins the Hart, because he was the more valuable player.

Fair enough.  It is an argument of inches, or centimetres.  In this case, the awards presented are for different things, even if they’re separated by semantics.

The above scenario actually occurred in the NHL.  The 1988-89 season saw Mario Lemieux rack up a stunning 199 points, leading his Pittsburgh Penguins to the playoffs for the first time during his tenure there.  Lemieux won the Art Ross, and was the First-Team All-Star centre…but he did not win the Hart Trophy.

That bauble went to Wayne Gretzky, during his first season with the Los Angeles Kings.  The Wayner put up an impressive 168 points and put hockey back on the map in Southern California.

For that, he was awarded the Hart.

I clearly recall Mr. Lemieux not being very happy about that, making a statement to the effect that historically speaking, the Art Ross winner usually gets the Hart.

Yes, but that should never be an automatic assumption, for if it is, why not just combine the two awards into one?  Regardless, the top scorer is not always the top performer during any given season, right Mr. Pronger or Mr. Hasek?

All that being said, I had no problem with Gretzky copping the ‘89 Hart Honours.  Lemieux was still amply compensated, and he would eventually win more Harts (having won his first the season before), though he would never again reach such magical numbers.  To this day, I look back at those 199 points and wish he could have picked up one more.  One more cheap assist from the home town official responsible for doling out gift points.

Then again, only Gretzky has reached and broken the 200-points in-one-regular-season plateau in the NHL.  That sounds about right.

I can live with the Hart Trophy winner not being on the First All-Star Team, for all the reasons given above.  That same logic doesn’t hold true for goaltenders; the Vezina Trophy is for the goalkeeper “adjudged to be the best at this position”.  Logic dictates he would also be the First Team All-Star goalie.

Taking a stroll again through the handy National Hockey League Official Guide & Record Book, 2008 edition, I’ve unearthed these gems.

In 2001-02, goaltender Jose Theodore of the Montreal Canadiens won the Hart Trophy, just edging Calgary’s Jarome Iginla for the honour.  Theodore also took home the Vezina, but was on the Second All-Star Team.  Patrick Roy of the Colorado Avalanche was the First Team goaltender.

It just looks bad.  Inconsistent. Sloppy.

Carrying on, I see that Mr. Flyer, Big Bad Bobby Clarke, won the Hart back in 72-73, but was only a Second Team All-Star Centre due to Big Bad Phil Esposito of the Bruins, who won his fourth Art Ross Trophy that year (and third in-a-row).

Okay, that’s not so sloppy, for all the reasons stated earlier.

1963-64, Big Jean Beliveau of Montreal got the Hart, but was a Second-Team All-Star centre behind Stan Mikita of the Chicago Black Hawks.  Banana blade Mikita won the Art Ross that year, and would capture the next two Harts.

The most interesting example of the Hart Trophy winner not being on the First All-Star Team occurred in 1954-55.  Toronto Maple Leafs’ captain Ted “Teeder” Kennedy won the big award, yet didn’t make EITHER post-season All Star squad.   Jean Beliveau and Ken Mosdell were both judged to be better than Teeder as centres…but obviously not better as the most valuable player to his team.

So, these discrepancies have happened a number of times in the history of the NHL, and I’ve only looked as far back as 54-55.

But it shouldn’t occur when it comes to First Team All-Star goaltenders and the Vezina.

It just looks bad.

Happy Summer, fellow sun worshippers.

- Mick Kern